Back to Blog
When companies need capital to grow, expand, or strengthen their balance sheets, the stock market becomes a powerful avenue. Two common ways companies raise money from public investors are through an Initial Public Offering (IPO) and a Follow-on Public Offering (FPO). While both involve issuing shares, they serve different purposes and come at different stages of a company’s lifecycle. For investors, understanding the difference between IPO and FPO is essential to evaluate risk, pricing, and long-term potential.
IPO and FPO: The Basic Difference
An IPO is the first step a company takes to enter the public markets. It marks the transition from a privately held entity to a publicly listed one. An FPO, on the other hand, is undertaken by a company that is already listed and has an existing trading history. Both are tools to raise capital, but the context in which they are used makes all the difference.
Why Understanding IPO vs FPO Matters
- Stage of the company: An IPO is launched when a company is opening itself to public ownership for the first time. Investors are introduced to the business largely through prospectuses and financial disclosures. In contrast, an FPO is issued by a company that is already known to the market, with past performance, share price trends, and public disclosures available for analysis.
- Purpose of raising funds: IPO proceeds are generally used for long-term growth initiatives such as expansion, technology upgrades, or debt reduction. FPOs may be used for similar reasons, but they can also help companies meet regulatory requirements, improve liquidity, or allow existing shareholders to reduce their stake.
- Pricing and valuation clarity: IPO pricing is based on estimated valuation and future growth potential, making it more sensitive to market sentiment. FPO pricing is usually linked to the current market price of the stock and is often offered at a discount, providing clearer valuation benchmarks for investors.
- Risk perception for investors: IPOs are typically considered riskier because the company has no prior public market track record. Investors rely heavily on projections and management guidance. FPOs tend to carry relatively lower perceived risk, as investors can evaluate actual performance, financial stability, and historical stock behavior.
- Liquidity and market familiarity: After an IPO, liquidity builds gradually as the stock starts trading. In an FPO, liquidity already exists, and investor participation is usually smoother due to familiarity with the company and its business model.
Click here to know about the myths and misconceptions of IPO investments.
How IPOs and FPOs Fit into an Investor’s Strategy
IPOs often attract investors seeking early entry and higher growth potential, despite higher uncertainty. They appeal to those willing to take calculated risks for the possibility of strong long-term returns. FPOs, meanwhile, are often preferred by investors looking for stability, value, or strategic additions to their portfolio, supported by existing market data and company performance.
Final Thoughts
IPO and FPO are not competing options but complementary stages in a company’s growth journey. An IPO represents a company’s entry into the public markets, filled with opportunity and uncertainty. An FPO reflects continuity, maturity, and evolving capital needs. For investors, understanding the difference between IPO and FPO helps align investment choices with risk appetite, financial goals, and market outlook. Informed decisions begin with clarity, and knowing how these two offerings differ is a strong step toward smarter investing.
